Spammy Backlinks Pointing at Your Law Firm Site: Should You Ignore Them or Disavow?

Table of Contents

Abstract blue chain links on a dark background

A report lands in the inbox saying the firm’s website has hundreds of “toxic” backlinks, sometimes with an offer to clean them up.

Law firm toxic backlinks sound alarming, but Google’s own help pages take a calmer view. Google says most sites will not need its disavow tool, and that it can usually work out which links to trust without help.

So which situations call for action, and which are safe to ignore?

Q SHORT ANSWER

Most law firms can ignore spammy backlinks they did not build.

Google says it can usually assess which links to trust, and that for known spam sites it typically ignores the links. The disavow tool is meant for sites with many spammy links that caused, or will likely cause, a manual action, and Google warns it can harm performance if used incorrectly.

What Google Says About Spammy Links Pointing at a Site

Google’s help pages give a consistent answer on spammy backlinks pointing at a site.

  • Google’s disavow links help page says, “In most cases, Google can assess which links to trust without additional guidance,” and that most sites will not need the tool.
  • The same page warns that used incorrectly, disavowing “can potentially harm your site’s performance in Google Search results.”
  • Google’s Links report help page says that for known spam sites, Google “typically will ignore the links.”
  • Google’s spam policies define link spam as creating links primarily to manipulate search rankings, such as buying links or using automated link programs.
  • When Google takes a manual action, it reports it in Search Console’s Manual actions report and message center.

The disavow page sets a narrow test: a considerable number of spammy, artificial or low-quality links that have caused a manual action or likely will.

Three Situations a Law Firm Might Be In

Random spam links the firm never built

Random spam links from sites the firm has never heard of need no action in most cases. Google says it typically ignores links from known spam sites. The verdict is to ignore them.

Links a past vendor bought or placed for the firm

Links a past SEO vendor bought or placed for the firm are a different story, because they may fall under Google’s link spam policy. Paid placements on other sites, such as niche edits, can count as buying links under that policy. The verdict is to check first. Try to get the links removed, and keep the disavow tool in mind if there are many of them.

A manual action for unnatural links

A manual action for unnatural links, shown in Search Console, is what the disavow tool exists for. Google recommends trying to remove the links first, then disavowing the ones that cannot be removed. The verdict is to act.

How the Disavow File Works

The disavow file is only for firms in the second or third situation. Google’s help page sets out the format:

  • A plain text file (.txt), encoded in UTF-8 or 7-bit ASCII
  • One URL or domain per line
  • A domain listed with the prefix “domain:” to cover the whole site
  • Lines starting with # treated as comments and ignored
  • One list per Search Console property, so a new upload replaces the old list

A successful upload can take a few weeks to take effect.

Where a Firm Should Look First

A firm worried about backlinks should check Search Console before buying any cleanup.

  • The Manual actions report shows whether Google has taken action against the site at all. No manual action, and no history of bought links, means the disavow test is unlikely to be met.
  • The Links report shows a sample of links. Google says it “isn’t a comprehensive list of every link,” so a long list elsewhere is not a reason for alarm on its own.

A toxicity score from a third-party tool is not a manual action from Google. For a small firm, time is better spent on small law firm SEO basics such as a complete Google Business Profile.

Frequently Asked Questions

Spammy backlinks a law firm did not build are unlikely to hurt its Google rankings. Google’s help pages say Google can usually assess which links to trust and typically ignores links from known spam sites. The exception is a manual action for unnatural links, which Search Console reports directly.

A law firm should think carefully before paying for a disavow cleanup service. Google says most sites do not need the disavow tool and that using it incorrectly can harm search performance. Unless the firm has a manual action or a history of bought links, a cleanup is unlikely to be needed.

Search Console does not show every link pointing to a law firm’s site. Google says the Links report is not a comprehensive list of every link and shows a sample to help explain the site’s overall link profile. Other tools may list links Search Console leaves out.

Disavowing links can hurt a law firm’s website if done incorrectly. Google warns the feature can potentially harm a site’s performance in Google Search results. Disavowing good links by mistake tells Google to ignore links that may have been helping.

âś” KEY TAKEAWAYS
  1. Google says most sites do not need the disavow tool and that it can usually assess which links to trust.
  2. For known spam sites, Google typically ignores the links.
  3. The disavow tool is for many spammy links tied to a manual action, or likely to cause one.
  4. Used incorrectly, disavowing can harm a site’s performance in Google Search.

Handling Law Firm Toxic Backlinks Without Wasting Money

Law firm toxic backlinks are mostly noise. Ignore the spam the firm never built, check anything a past vendor bought, and save the disavow tool for a manual action or a real risk of one. That approach keeps money in the budget and avoids the harm a careless disavow file can cause.

The better long-term answer is to earn links that nobody needs to worry about. Pages that answer client questions well, and resources other sites want to cite, attract links on their own merit.

Lexicon’s legal content experts build that kind of material through law firm content marketing, with every piece written to be worth linking to. Call (877) 486-8123 to plan the next round of content.

About the author

David Arato, JD

Founder & CEO

David B. Arato established Lexicon Legal Content in 2012 after identifying a significant market need: law firms and marketing agencies struggled to consistently source high-quality written content at scale. As a 2009 graduate of St. Louis University School of Law, David combines legal expertise with content strategy to deliver exceptional results for clients.

Get in touch


Our blog

Related Blog

Free Sample

What Makes Lexicon’s Content Different?

If you would like to learn more about Lexicon Legal Content, visit our homepage.

Fill out the form below to request a free sample!